Division 7A

Bucket companies and sub-trusts – no longer a guaranteed shield against Division 7A

21 March 2022

Almost 6 years ago, as part of the 2016-17 Federal Budget, the Government announced that it would make amendments to improve the operation of Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). The Government reiterated this intention in the 2018-19 Federal Budget, also clarifying that it will ensure that unpaid present entitlements (UPEs) come within the scope of Division 7A.

Following a Treasury consultation paper released in October 2018, there has been no draft legislation or further consultations announced.

Fast forward to February 2022, and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has issued draft Tax Determination TD 2022/D1 which broadens the scope of Division 7A to sub-trust arrangements involving UPEs. It is unclear whether this is intended as a substitute for comprehensive legislative amendments.

When does Division 7A apply?

Division 7A operates to ensure that private companies do not make tax-free distributions of profits to shareholders or their associates in the form of payments, loans or forgiven debts.

A private company will be taken to pay an unfranked dividend if it makes a loan to a shareholder or their associate unless the loan is fully repaid or converted into a Division 7A complying loan by the company’s lodgement day for the income year.

A ‘loan’ for the purposes of Division 7A includes any ‘form of financial accommodation’.

Bucket companies and the provision of financial accommodation

Private family groups often utilise discretionary trusts as part of their business structure. The trustees will often appoint trust income to a related private company beneficiary (colloquially known as a ‘bucket company’). The bucket company is then assessed on its share of the trust’s net income, paying tax at the corporate rate of 30% or 25% for base rate entities1 rather than the progressive marginal rates applying to individual beneficiaries with a top rate of 45% (plus Medicare levy of 2%).

Where the trustee appoints trust income to a corporate beneficiary but the entitlement is not paid, the company has a UPE owing from the trustee.

If the company has ‘knowledge’ of this UPE and does not demand immediate payment by the trustee, the company is taken to have provided financial accommodation to the trustee. Accordingly, the company is taken to have made a Division 7A loan to the trustee.

This is a particular risky area for family groups, where it is more likely that the trustee of the discretionary trust and the director(s) of the corporate beneficiary will be the same individuals, such that both entities have the same ‘directing mind and will’ – the consequence being that the company will immediately have ‘knowledge’ of its UPE upon the trustee resolving to distribute trust income to the corporate beneficiary.

Sub-trust arrangements

In PS LA 2010/42, the ATO previously took the view that a UPE owing to a corporate beneficiary would not be treated as a Division 7A loan if the funds representing the UPE were held on sub-trust for the sole benefit of the company. This was due to the rationale that where the funds are held on sub-trust solely for the benefit of the corporate beneficiary, its present entitlement to the trust income has been paid. In these circumstances, there is no outstanding UPE.

Accordingly, sub-trust structures were commonly implemented to manage Division 7A risks, and required that all of the benefits from the investment of the funds held in the sub-trust flow back to the corporate beneficiary. It was also permissible that the funds in the sub-trust be invested back into the main trust (for example, by the sub-trust lending funds to the main trust on an interest-only 7-year or 10-year loan).

Example of a sub-trust arrangement

Assume the following facts:

  • Sarah and Ryan are spouses and operate their family business via the SR Family Trust, a discretionary trust.
  • Sarah and Ryan control Trustee Co, the trustee of the SR Family Trust.
  • X Co is a private company controlled by Sarah and Ryan, and is within the class of general beneficiaries of the SR Family Trust.

Step 1:

  • On 30 June 2022, Trustee Co resolves to distribute 100% of the SR Family Trust’s income to X Co for the 2022 income year.
  • On 1 August 2022, Trustee Co determines the net income of the SR Family Trust for the 2022 income year as $100,000. At this time, X Co has a UPE and a right to demand immediate payment from Trustee Co.
  • On 1 August 2022, X Co is taken to have made a Division 7A loan to Trustee Co, being the provision of financial accommodation.

Step 2:

  • On 1 August 2022, Trustee Co sets aside $100,000 on sub-trust for the benefit of X Co, in order to comply with Division 7A and ensure there is no UPE owing to X Co.

Updated ATO view regarding the use of sub-trusts

The ATO has now revised its position on the use of sub-trusts to avoid the application of Division 7A. The ATO now considers that where a trustee sets aside a UPE owing to a private company into a sub-trust, and the company ‘consents’ to the use of those funds by the trustee, such as where the funds are re-invested in the main trust, this constitutes the provision of financial accommodation from the private company to the trustee.3

It is now critical that funds held in sub-trusts are not mixed with the funds of the main trust, and that there is sufficient documentary evidence to show that the funds are held for the sole benefit of the corporate beneficiary.

The ATO’s updated view broadens the circumstances in which sub-trust arrangements will trigger Division 7A, resulting in a high risk of these provisions applying to private groups where the trustee and corporate beneficiary have common controllers.

Once finalised, TD 2022/D1 is proposed to apply to trust entitlements arising on or after 1 July 2022. It is proposed that PS LA 2010/4 and TR 2010/3 will be withdrawn from 1 July 2022 for trust entitlements arising on or after that time.


In its Top 500 private groups tax performance program, the ATO concluded that Top 500 shareholders and their associates were accessing company funds for private use, including transactions through associated trusts, in non-compliance with Division 7A. In light of these conclusions, and the new ATO guidance, it is expected that there will be increased compliance activity focused on private groups.

We note that TD 2022/D1 was released together with several other publications related to reimbursement agreements under section 100A of the ITAA 1936 (TR 2022/D1, TA 2022/1 and PCG 2022/D1). Accordingly, it is clear that the use of trust structures by private groups is a priority focus of the ATO.

TD 2022/D1 states that the ATO will not devote compliance resources to sub-trust arrangements conducted in accordance with PS LA 2010/4 in respect of trust entitlements arising before 1 July 2022. However if the ATO becomes aware of a sub-trust arrangement during the course of an audit, we expect that such arrangements would be examined.

Please contact the Tax team if you are currently subject to an ATO investigation or audit. We can also assist private groups in reviewing their current arrangements to ensure compliance with the new guidance.

1. Being companies with aggregated turnover for the year of less than $50 million and which have no more than 80% of their assessable income being passive income.
2. Practice Statement Law Administration 2010/4: Division 7A: trust entitlements.
3. In these circumstances, the private company has made a loan to the trustee, being a shareholder or associate of a shareholder (by virtue of the common controllers). 

Disclaimer: This publication contains comments of a general nature only and is provided as an information service. It is not intended to be relied upon as, nor is it a substitute for specific professional advice. No responsibility can be accepted by Rigby Cooke Lawyers or the authors for loss occasioned to any person doing anything as a result of any material in this publication.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

©2022 Rigby Cooke Lawyers