Court made Wills

28 March 2019

The freedom to make a Will and to leave your estate to whomever you choose (called testamentary freedom) is one of the most fundamental principles of succession law in Australia.

However, testamentary freedom is subject to Family Provision Legislation which imposes a duty on willmakers to make adequate provision for certain individuals, usually (but not limited to) spouses and children.

In order to make a Will, a willmaker must have testamentary capacity to make a Will.

Testamentary capacity can generally be divided into two categories:

  • Legal capacity – a person must be over the age of 18 to legally make a Will (there are some exceptions).
  • Mental capacity – to have testamentary capacity, a person must:
    • understand the nature of the Will and its effect
    • have some idea of the extent of the property of which they are disposing under the Will
    • be aware of the persons for whom the willmaker would usually be expected to provide (even if he/she chooses not to) and be free from any delusion of the mind that would cause him reason not to benefit those people

Where there is no testamentary capacity to make a Will, the Wills Act 1997 enables the court to authorise the making of a Will (and by implication the revocation of an earlier Will), for a person who lacks testamentary capacity.

An application may be made by any person, however the permission of the court is required before an application can be made.

If the court authorises the making of a Will, the court made Will is signed by the Registrar, and sealed with the court seal.

The court made Will is also retained by the Registrar for safekeeping.

In deciding whether an application for a court made Will is appropriate, a number of factors should be considered, including:

  • If there is a Will – what does it say? is it still appropriate? If not, why not?
  • If there is no Will:
    • Who would take the estate on an intestacy?
    • Is the pattern of distribution on an intestacy appropriate? If not, why not?
  • The current position of the person for whom the Will is proposed to be made, including:
    • Does the proposed Will or revocation reflect what would likely be the intentions of the person, or what the intentions of the person might reasonably be expected to be, if the person had testamentary capacity; and
    • Is it reasonable in all the circumstances for the court, by order, to authorise the making of the Will for the person.

Mrs Smith’s Story

Mrs Smith was aged 92 and lacked testamentary capacity. The applicant was her son Mr Jones who was also her appointed attorney.

Mrs Smith had entered into a matrimonial property settlement with her husband, but they were not legally separated or divorced. The property settlement resulted in a division of matrimonial assets between them on the basis of approximately 53/47 per cent in favour of Mrs Smith.

In monetary value, Mrs Smith’s share had a value of approximately $1.986 million and her husband’s share had a value of approximately $1.730 million.

Mrs Smith’s son made an application for a statutory Will which sought to exclude her husband.

Evidence was provided to the court that demonstrated that in her previous three wills Mrs Smith did not ever leave her husband a substantial part of her estate. In fact, Mrs Smith did not ever leave her husband anything close to the equivalent sum he received under the property settlement.

In the end, the court was satisfied that if Mrs Smith had testamentary capacity following the property settlement she would have likely left out her husband leaving the residue of her estate to her two sons equally. A statutory Will was ordered to accomplish Mrs Smith’s likely intentions if she had had capacity at the time.

If you require further information or assistance with obtaining a statutory (court made) Will please contact our Wills and Estates team.

Get our newsletter

Stay up to date with the latest legal insights and news

Sign Up