Recent publications
Please contact Norma Binding at Rigby Cooke for more information about Publication
items
T 03 9321 7852
E nbinding@rigbycooke.com.au
You will need Acrobat Reader to read or print this PDF file.
Click here to download this free software.
3 Nov 08
Retail Alert: Landlords' obligation to notify
Grant Levy, Partner & Bill Karvela, Partner
The recent Victorian Supreme Court decision (handed down on 13 October 2008) of Xiao v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited Anor [2008] VSC 412 has serious consequences for landlords of retail premises.
21 Oct 08
Restitution law & infrastructure projects: Liability for Sponsors and Financiers
Andrew Venables, Partner
Restitution law allows a remedy where parties have not formed a contract, or the contract is unenforceable but benefits have still flowed. It is confined to certain categories of case developed in the common law tradition.
Where parties have a direct and enforceable contract, it is not possible to go outside that contract and make a claim in restitution.
20 Oct 08
Real Estate and The Law
By the Rigby Cooke Property Group
- New Contract of Sale
- Off-the-plan stamp duty amendments
- Contaminated land
- Leases & rent reviews
- Tree maintenance
- Owners Corporations
10 Oct 08
Tax Update: Is there a tax aspect to that new file?
By the Rigby Cooke Tax and Superannuation Team
A recent VCAT case highlights the need for lawyers and accountants to consider all “angles” when advising a client on a transaction – unless they want to be successfully sued for negligence! In Snopkowski v Jones [2008] VCAT 1943, the issue was if a conveyancing lawyer had an obligation to advise on CGT even though not directly asked to.
3 Oct 08
Friday Facts:
Genuine dispute of tax assessment not enough to set aside statutory demand
Mary Nemeth, Partner
On 3 September 2008, the High Court handed down its decision in favour of the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Broadbeach Properties, MA Howard Racing Pty Ltd and Neutral Bay [2008] HCA 41. It held that statutory demands which had been issued by the Deputy Commissioner, based on notices of assessment which were subject to dispute, could not be set aside despite the existence of proceedings objecting to the assessments.
1 Oct 08
Commercial Update: Privacy law overhaul - big changes on the way
Suzanne Harmer, Special Counsel
- One set of united privacy principles applicable to both private and public sectors
- The end of the “small business” and “employee records” exemptions from strict privacy law compliance
- The compulsory reporting of major personal information security breaches
- A statutory right to privacy
These are just four of 300 recommendations in the Australian Law Reform Commission’s extensive report into Australia’s privacy laws released in August 2008.
26 Sept 08
Superannuation Update
By the Rigby Cooke Tax and Superannuation Team
In this Update, we discuss a ruling and an AAT decision in relation to the superannuation guarantee, as well as changes to superannuation rates and thresholds that apply for the 2008-2009 year.
- Superannuation guarantee: payments made to sportspersons
- Non-cash contributions to superannuation funds
- Changes to superannuation rates and thresholds
- Bonus payments OTE for SGC purposes
- Crystallised segment of a superannuation interest
19 Sept 08
Friday Facts: Exercise caution in the race to be green
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Anja Schneider, Articled Clerk
With growing concern for the future of our planet, consumers are increasingly demanding a “green” marketplace. In an effort to entice consumers and oust competitors, businesses are rapidly adopting “greener” practices and vigorously promoting their “green” credentials. However, in the race to be “green”, businesses must be careful not to make inaccurate and unsubstantiated claims or will risk facing the full brunt of Australia’s consumer watchdog, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission.
5 Sept 08
Friday Facts: Advice privilege explained
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Toniel Paton, Lawyer
Clients quite often seek legal advice from their lawyers which requires the need to obtain an expert opinion in order to provide the legal opinion required. The common law principle of “advice privilege” usually applies to protect the confidentiality in the expert opinion which is obtained for that purpose.
26 Aug 08
Customs and Trade Law Update: Copycats beware!
Ian Rosenfeld, Partner & Philip Sheezel, Consultant
Owners of design rights and other intellectual property rights have recently been encouraged by legal action taken by UK fashion label Ted Baker to protect its rights.
22 Aug 08
Friday Facts:
Responding to statutory demands - step on it, fast!
|Mary Nemeth, Partner & Karen Zeev, Lawyer
The recent High Court case of Aussie Vic Plant Hire Pty Ltd v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd has confirmed the position that once the time for compliance with a statutory demand has expired, no application by the debtor can be made to extend that time. The only remedy available to the debtor company is to defend itself by proving its solvency, which can not only be difficult but also costly.
8 Aug 08
Friday Facts:
Public interest immunity protected
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Tracey Bischofberger, Associate
In the recent decision of Australian Securities and Investment Commission v P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia considered whether or not it should compel ASIC to produce documents which would ultimately disclose the identity of its informants.
31 July 08
Commercial Update: Financial assistance in an acquisition - add it to your checklist
Suzanne Harmer, Special Counsel
Frequently, parties to an acquisition overlook the Corporations Act requirements in Parts 2J.3 and 2J.4 when financial assistance is given by an entity in relation to an acquisition of shares in itself or its parent. This may involve compliance. If not considered in advance, the transaction may be delayed in proceeding to schedule or may involve additional procedures not initially contemplated by the parties. The relevant provisions are Sections 260A – 260E.
31 July 08
Real Estate and The Law: There are no shortcuts when developing contaminated land!
Jo Robinson, Senior Associate
A parent company’s historic operations involving the storage of potential contaminants in underground storage tanks could today be held financially liable for clean up costs incurred by the current day occupier of contaminated land.
25 July 08
Friday Facts: Did you know there are exceptions to bankruptcy?
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Michael Tuohey, Articled Clerk
Quite often clients are unaware that there are certain debts which will survive bankruptcy. That is, a bankrupt will not automatically be released from all of their debts just because they have become bankrupt..
11 July 08
Friday Facts: Sellers beware
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Karen Zeev, Lawyer
The recent case of Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Nudie Foods Australia Pty Ltd in the Federal Court of Australia has highlighted the importance of manufacturers of consumer products ensuring that they do not mislead or deceive consumers with representations made about their products.
27 June 08
Friday Facts:
ASIC commences proceedings
against 8 company directors and
their lawyer
for Phoenix trading
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Tracey Bischofberger, Associate
In late May 2008, ASIC commenced civil proceedings in the Supreme Court of New South Wales against eight company directors and the companies' lawyer, Timothy Donald Somerville, over their involvement in alleged Phoenix trading.
June 08
Superannuation Update
By the Rigby Cooke Tax and Superannuation Team
In this Update, we look at the Instalment Warrant revolution and recent developments, including
- Certain borrowings by SMSFs
- Application of the SIS Act to unpaid trust distributions payable to a SMSF
- Application of subsection 66(1) to contributions of assets to a SMSF by a related party
13 June 08
Friday Facts: Do litigation funders receive priority in a winding up?
Mary Nemeth, Partner
In the recent case of Meadow Springs Fairway Resort Ltd (In Liquidation) v Balanced Securities Limited (No 2), the Federal Court considered whether a litigation funder should receive priority over claims made by secured creditors in a winding up.
30 May 08
Friday Facts: Court approves appointment of special purpose liquidator
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Toniel Paton, Lawyer
In the recent case of Lo v Nielsen & Moller (Autoglass) (NSW) Pty Ltd, the New South Wales Supreme Court considered with approval an application by a creditor for the appointment of two special purpose liquidators.
26 May 08
Litigation Update: Settlement of apportionable claims -
Remaining contribution claims futile
Theo Kalyvas, Partner & Andrew Whitelaw, Partner
The recent decision by Justice Mandie in the case of Surrowee Pty Ltd v Hansen Yunken Pty Ltd; Godfrey Spowers (Victoria) Pty Ltd v Lincolne Scott Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [2008] VSC 90 in the Victorian Supreme Court upholds the legislature's intent to provide for the separate liability of each defendant before a court in an apportionable claim..
21 May 08
Building and Construction Update: Can litigation be faster and cheaper?
By the Rigby Cooke Building and Construction Team
16 May 08
Friday Facts; Secured creditors beware
Mary Nemeth, Partner
Quite often creditors who hold a fixed and floating charge consider that their interest is protected if a company goes into liquidation and that they will rank ahead of unsecured creditors. The decision of Tolcher v National Australia Bank Ltd reminds us that is not the case.
7 Mar 08
Estate Planning Update: Testamentary Trusts
Robin Parsons,
Accredited Wills & Estate Specialist and Special Counsel
What are they and should I have one too?
22 Feb 08
Friday Facts: Liquidators need to seek court approval for litigation funding
Mary Nemeth, Partner & Tracey Bischofberger, Associate
Recent developments in the case law dealing with litigation funding have further expanded on the principles which will be considered by the Court concerning the legitimacy of litigation funding.
Jan 08
Superannuation Update
By the Rigby Cooke Tax and Superannuation Team
There have always been various significant restrictions in relation to the investments that a superannuation fund may make.

